Post by YellowBrix on Mar 1, 2009 1:49:18 GMT -5
Indiana Prison Chief: Safety Requires Additional Cells
INDIANAPOLIS, IN – After serving 12 years of a 20-year sentence for a slew of crimes, including robbery and kidnapping, Kelvin Fuller was moved in 2007 from his maximum-security cell to medium-security confines.
A couple of weeks later, Fuller escaped. He went on a five-day crime spree that included robbing a Fishers bank and attacking and robbing a female bus driver in Merrillville before he was captured in Montana.
To Indiana Department of Correction Commissioner Ed Buss, Fuller is the poster child for why, even though Indiana is cash-strapped in this current economic downturn, the state needs to build additional maximum-security cell blocks at two of its prisons.
Despite double-bunking maximum-security prisoners and even triple-bunking lower-security prisoners, DOC facilities are at 99 percent capacity. With about 7,400 maximum-security prisoners right now and only 6,186 maximum-security beds, Buss fears more Fullers.
“There is no way that he should have been in a medium-security facility,” Buss told lawmakers in a recent Indiana House Ways and Means Committee hearing.
“However, there wasn’t enough beds at the state prison, so you have to take chances. . . . Unfortunately there’s consequences that come with that.”
If lawmakers are only now beginning to understand that, they have only themselves to blame for at least part of the problem.
Since 1989, the legislature has passed 116 laws creating new crimes or stiffening penalties. Each law alone might account for only a couple of more years in prison on any given offense — but they add up. Overall, lawmakers have approved new laws resulting in 250 to 275 years of additional prison time.
“We clearly have a tendency to want to show that we’re strong on law enforcement by passing more crimes and by elevating things to felonies. That’s somewhat of a contagious disease around here,” said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville.
Aggravating the problem: The last new prison built in Indiana was in 2001, when Miami Correctional Facility in Bunker Hill in north-central Indiana was expanded by 1,632 medium-security beds. The last maximum-security prison, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility near Carlisle in southwestern Indiana, was built in 1992. Debate over priorities
Seeking to address the problem, Gov. Mitch Daniels last month proposed spending $40 million to add 612 beds at Miami and 576 beds at Wabash Valley.
They were the only capital improvement projects in his proposed two-year state budget.
At the same time, Daniels proposed boosting the DOC’s budget by $105 million while placing a two-year moratorium on big-dollar university projects, cutting the budget for higher education by an average of 4 percent and essentially flat-lining K-12 education spending.
His proposals set off a debate in the Statehouse over whether the state’s spending priorities are out of whack.
“It would be difficult to justify an expansion of prison beds at a time when the governor’s proposed to sort of flat-line education. It emphasizes incarceration over education,” said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Crawford, D-Indianapolis.
Senate Minority Leader Vi Simpson, D-Ellettsville, said she’d rather see those prison dollars going to education, including Indiana University at Bloomington, which is in her district.
“The budget expresses the state’s priorities,” Simpson said. “When you’re cutting the higher-ed budget in order to fund the Department of Correction, that seems like priorities turned upside down.”
To Buss, it’s a matter of public safety.
Four years ago, he said, male maximum-security inmates made up 22 percent of the DOC population. That’s risen to 29 percent, the fastest-growing segment of inmates.
“The department’s baseline budget has been flat the last four years, while higher education and other initiatives have gotten priority,” Buss said. “So now it’s simply time to add capacity to prisons.”
Crawford does agree with Buss on one thing: The legislature is partly responsible for the growing prison population.
Larry Landis, executive director of the Indiana Public Defender Council, said he’s identified at least 40 bills this session that would add crimes and prison time.
The DOC “doesn’t really have a choice” except to ask for more money to house the inmates, he said, but the state also needs to find long-term solutions.
Landis recommends giving judges more discretion in sentencing by not requiring mandatory minimum sentences and giving parole boards the discretion to decide whether an inmate is no longer a threat and can be released.
Terry Baumer, director of criminal justice and public safety programs at the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, also blames the war on drugs for filling up prison space that should be used by violent offenders. About a quarter of those who went to prison last year were sentenced on drug charges, he said.
He noted that the crime rate is going down — from a high of 525.1 violent crimes per 100,000 Hoosiers in 1994 to 333.6 in 2007, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics — but Indiana’s prison population continues to grow by about 4 percent each year.
At a cost of $54.28 per day — or more than $19,000 annually to house and feed an inmate — Indiana needs to find alternatives, Landis said.
“We can’t afford this mindless, endless prison construction,” he said. Short-term solutions
Building the new cell blocks at Miami and Wabash Valley already is Plan B for Buss.
He’d hoped to build a $100 million maximum-security prison but scrapped that idea when it became clear that the state couldn’t afford it now.
If the legislature doesn’t agree to build new cell blocks, Buss will go to Plan C.
“We’ll have to make a decision this summer to start triple-bunking (maximum-security prisoners) or closing program areas here at Wabash Valley like the gymnasium, maybe the school, and converting them to housing units,” he said as he toured Wabash Valley last week with a reporter.
Triple-bunking maximum-security prisoners, he said, is “unheard of.”
“Even California (notorious for prison crowding) doesn’t triple-bunk maximum-security offenders,” he said.
The thought of adding 50 inmates to cell blocks that already house 100 is alarming to corrections officers and inmates.
“We’ll probably have more murders, lots of guys killing each other,” predicted Rodney Johnson, 24, Fort Wayne, who is serving a 34-year sentence at Wabash Valley for aggravated battery and criminal recklessness.
James Manuel, a corrections officer at Wabash Valley, said adding inmates would make an already tough job more dangerous.
Though the overall ratio is three employees to one inmate at Wabash Valley, when inmates are in their cellblocks, particularly at night, they outnumber corrections officers 100 to 1.
“You add another 50 bodies on to that,” Manuel said, “it’d be crazy.”
INDIANAPOLIS, IN – After serving 12 years of a 20-year sentence for a slew of crimes, including robbery and kidnapping, Kelvin Fuller was moved in 2007 from his maximum-security cell to medium-security confines.
A couple of weeks later, Fuller escaped. He went on a five-day crime spree that included robbing a Fishers bank and attacking and robbing a female bus driver in Merrillville before he was captured in Montana.
To Indiana Department of Correction Commissioner Ed Buss, Fuller is the poster child for why, even though Indiana is cash-strapped in this current economic downturn, the state needs to build additional maximum-security cell blocks at two of its prisons.
Despite double-bunking maximum-security prisoners and even triple-bunking lower-security prisoners, DOC facilities are at 99 percent capacity. With about 7,400 maximum-security prisoners right now and only 6,186 maximum-security beds, Buss fears more Fullers.
“There is no way that he should have been in a medium-security facility,” Buss told lawmakers in a recent Indiana House Ways and Means Committee hearing.
“However, there wasn’t enough beds at the state prison, so you have to take chances. . . . Unfortunately there’s consequences that come with that.”
If lawmakers are only now beginning to understand that, they have only themselves to blame for at least part of the problem.
Since 1989, the legislature has passed 116 laws creating new crimes or stiffening penalties. Each law alone might account for only a couple of more years in prison on any given offense — but they add up. Overall, lawmakers have approved new laws resulting in 250 to 275 years of additional prison time.
“We clearly have a tendency to want to show that we’re strong on law enforcement by passing more crimes and by elevating things to felonies. That’s somewhat of a contagious disease around here,” said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville.
Aggravating the problem: The last new prison built in Indiana was in 2001, when Miami Correctional Facility in Bunker Hill in north-central Indiana was expanded by 1,632 medium-security beds. The last maximum-security prison, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility near Carlisle in southwestern Indiana, was built in 1992. Debate over priorities
Seeking to address the problem, Gov. Mitch Daniels last month proposed spending $40 million to add 612 beds at Miami and 576 beds at Wabash Valley.
They were the only capital improvement projects in his proposed two-year state budget.
At the same time, Daniels proposed boosting the DOC’s budget by $105 million while placing a two-year moratorium on big-dollar university projects, cutting the budget for higher education by an average of 4 percent and essentially flat-lining K-12 education spending.
His proposals set off a debate in the Statehouse over whether the state’s spending priorities are out of whack.
“It would be difficult to justify an expansion of prison beds at a time when the governor’s proposed to sort of flat-line education. It emphasizes incarceration over education,” said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Crawford, D-Indianapolis.
Senate Minority Leader Vi Simpson, D-Ellettsville, said she’d rather see those prison dollars going to education, including Indiana University at Bloomington, which is in her district.
“The budget expresses the state’s priorities,” Simpson said. “When you’re cutting the higher-ed budget in order to fund the Department of Correction, that seems like priorities turned upside down.”
To Buss, it’s a matter of public safety.
Four years ago, he said, male maximum-security inmates made up 22 percent of the DOC population. That’s risen to 29 percent, the fastest-growing segment of inmates.
“The department’s baseline budget has been flat the last four years, while higher education and other initiatives have gotten priority,” Buss said. “So now it’s simply time to add capacity to prisons.”
Crawford does agree with Buss on one thing: The legislature is partly responsible for the growing prison population.
Larry Landis, executive director of the Indiana Public Defender Council, said he’s identified at least 40 bills this session that would add crimes and prison time.
The DOC “doesn’t really have a choice” except to ask for more money to house the inmates, he said, but the state also needs to find long-term solutions.
Landis recommends giving judges more discretion in sentencing by not requiring mandatory minimum sentences and giving parole boards the discretion to decide whether an inmate is no longer a threat and can be released.
Terry Baumer, director of criminal justice and public safety programs at the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, also blames the war on drugs for filling up prison space that should be used by violent offenders. About a quarter of those who went to prison last year were sentenced on drug charges, he said.
He noted that the crime rate is going down — from a high of 525.1 violent crimes per 100,000 Hoosiers in 1994 to 333.6 in 2007, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics — but Indiana’s prison population continues to grow by about 4 percent each year.
At a cost of $54.28 per day — or more than $19,000 annually to house and feed an inmate — Indiana needs to find alternatives, Landis said.
“We can’t afford this mindless, endless prison construction,” he said. Short-term solutions
Building the new cell blocks at Miami and Wabash Valley already is Plan B for Buss.
He’d hoped to build a $100 million maximum-security prison but scrapped that idea when it became clear that the state couldn’t afford it now.
If the legislature doesn’t agree to build new cell blocks, Buss will go to Plan C.
“We’ll have to make a decision this summer to start triple-bunking (maximum-security prisoners) or closing program areas here at Wabash Valley like the gymnasium, maybe the school, and converting them to housing units,” he said as he toured Wabash Valley last week with a reporter.
Triple-bunking maximum-security prisoners, he said, is “unheard of.”
“Even California (notorious for prison crowding) doesn’t triple-bunk maximum-security offenders,” he said.
The thought of adding 50 inmates to cell blocks that already house 100 is alarming to corrections officers and inmates.
“We’ll probably have more murders, lots of guys killing each other,” predicted Rodney Johnson, 24, Fort Wayne, who is serving a 34-year sentence at Wabash Valley for aggravated battery and criminal recklessness.
James Manuel, a corrections officer at Wabash Valley, said adding inmates would make an already tough job more dangerous.
Though the overall ratio is three employees to one inmate at Wabash Valley, when inmates are in their cellblocks, particularly at night, they outnumber corrections officers 100 to 1.
“You add another 50 bodies on to that,” Manuel said, “it’d be crazy.”